AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 290 wordsWith the consent of Learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the revision is heard and decided finally.
This revision has been preferred against the order dated 23.12.2017 passed by the Family Court, Mahasamund in M.Cr.C. No.113 of 2017,
whereby the Family Court has allowed the application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. and granted maintenance of Rs.1,000/- each, total Rs.2,000/-
per month in favour of the Applicants. The Applicants have preferred the instant revision for enhancement in the amount of maintenance.
I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the material available with due care.
As per the pleadings and the evidence adduced by the Applicant No.1/wife, the Respondent/husband owns 10 acres of land. He is engaged in
purchase and sale of paddy and thereby earns Rs.25,000/- per month. The Respondent has admitted that he has passed post graduation course of
M.A. and before the marriage, he had told the family members of the wife/Applicant No.1 that he owns 2 acres of land and he is engaged in purchase
and sale of paddy. From the above admissions of the Respondent/husband, it is clear that he is engaged in purchase and sale of paddy and he also
owns agricultural land. In these circumstances, the maintenance of Rs.1,000/- each granted to the Applicants by the Family Court is definitely on
lower side.
Considering the social status of the parties and the monthly income of the Respondent, it would be expedient to grant maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per
month to each of the Applicants, i.e., total Rs.4,000/- per month. This order of enhancement in the amount of maintenance shall be effective from
today itself.
In the result, the revision is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
