High CourtsSingle Bench

Purvi Jain Bohra vs Ritesh Bohra

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 8 July 2019 · Citation: (2019) 07 CHH CK 0052

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Prasanna Sharma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 9
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 24 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 232 words

Ram Prasanna Sharma, J

1.

This is wife's petition for transfer of petition filed before the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 registered as Case No. 449 of 2018 (Ritesh Bohra vs Smt. Purvi Jain Bohra) to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg.

2.

As per version of the petitioner, respondent/husband has filed the petition at Raipur while petitioner/wife is a resident of House No.56, Amrapali Society, Power House, Durg on the ground of inconvenience.

3.

The application is opposed by the respondent on the ground that it is also inconvenient to him to go to Durg because he is serving at Raipur. He has placed reliance on the decision of High Court of Calcutta in the matter of Dipika Agarwal @ Dipika Khaitan vs. Rishi Agrawal (C.O.No.622 of 2019) decided on July 4, 2019.

4.

In the matter of Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi reported in (2005) 12 Supreme Court Cases-237, it is held that in such case inconvenience of the wife is to be preferred over the convenience of the husband.

5.

Accordingly, Case No. 49 of 2018 (Ritesh Bohra vs Smt. Purvi Jain Bohra) pending before the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur is transferred to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur with immediate effect.

6.

Accordingly, the Transfer Petition is allowed.