High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 01 SHI CK 0052

Pushpa Devi vs State Of H.P And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 4 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narayana Swamy, CJ · Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 65 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 333 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

1.

The petitioner aged 31 years and who appeared in +2 exam with the 2nd respondent, i.e., HPSEB, Dharamshala, has come up before this Court

seeking directions to declare her result of final examination.

2.

The petitioner had passed his matriculation examination (secondary school) from Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shiksha Sansthan vide annexure P/4.

The said Shiksha Sansthan issued him a certificate with Sr.No.27089 and declared her pass in 2nd Division. Based on the said certificate, the

petitioner appeared for +2 examination with Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education. The grievance of the petitioner is that now the respondent-

Board is not declaring her result due to the reasons that she had passed her matriculation from Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shiksha Sansthan.

3.

In CWP No.849 of 2019 titled Priyanka Devi Vs. State of H.P and others, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court had relied upon the instructions placed

on record by the learned counsel for the HPSEB, which revealed that Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shiksha Sansthan was recognized during the period

from 1. 12.2017 to 5.2.2019. A perusal of the matriculation certificate, Annexure P/4 reveals that it was issued on 11.3.2019. Thus, even this

certificate was issued during the period when the said Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shiksha Sansthan was a recognized institute.

4.

Given above, for the purpose of attaining higher education, the said certificate was valid and thus, we direct respondent No.2-Board to declare the

result of the petitioner forthwith. We clarify that we have declared the matriculation certificate dated 11.3.2019 issued by Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi

Shiksha Sansthan valid only for the purpose of acquiring education higher than the said certificate, which in this case was +2. We are not expressing

any opinion about the equivalence certificate for the reasons that once the petitioner acquires higher education, then there would be no need for her to

refer her to the lower examination.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, this petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly.