High CourtsSingle Bench

Pushpa Devi vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 June 2022 · Citation: (2022) 06 P&H CK 0041

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kshetarpal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 304B · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 173
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 25235 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 221 words

Anil Kshetarpal, J

The petitioner prays for bail pending trial in FIR No.186, dated 30.11.2021, under Sections 304-B, 34 of the IPC registered at Police Station City-1, Mansa, District Mansa.

As per case of prosecution, Rishu Gupta, who was married to the petitioner's son, died. Her dead body was found from a canal. The prosecution claims that the petitioner along with her other family members was harassing late Smt. Rishu Gupta on account of insufficient dowry. The petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2021. Sh. Sonu, Rishu Gupta's husband, is stated to have informed his brother-in-law that Rishu Gupta has left the house without informing the family members.

On conclusion of the investigation, the police has filed final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. The Court has also framed charges on 25.05.2022. The petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2021. She does not have any other criminal antecedents.

The conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time. The petitioner is in judicial custody. Hence, further incarceration of the petitioner, at this stage, is not considered appropriate.

Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the aforesaid facts, it is considered appropriate to release the petitioner on regular bail on her furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Area Magistrate.

The petition stands allowed.