AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 541 wordsThe case of the petitioner is that she applied for the post of Teacher Grade-III (Level-II) in the subject of Hindi for Zila Parishad, Jaipur pursuant to the advertisement dated 31.7.2018. It has been submitted that as the applications were made on-line the petitioner availed of the services of E-Kiosk for filling up the application form. And in the process it appears that aside of the petitioner applying in the ST category, to which she belongs, the Ex-serviceman category was also erroneously ticked by the person manning the E-Kiosk. Resultantly the petitioner is being treated in the ST (Ex-serviceman) category for reason of the incorrect information which intruded in her on-line application form. She is therefore not being appointed as Teacher Grade-III (Level-II) in the subject of Hindi in Zila Parishad, Jaipur or elsewhere as per her graded preference in the application form, which she would otherwise be, on her comparative merit, if treated only a Scheduled Tribe candidate. Counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kavita Choudhary Versus The Registrar (Examination) & Anr. {D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1700/2017} decided on 1.11.2017 to contend that the DB has held that errors in the application form, if sought to be rectified before third party rights are created, should be cured, for it is human error and divine to forgive. It has been submitted that pursuant to the advertisement dated 31.7.2018 there are presently 100s of vacancies of Teacher Grade-III (LevelII) in the subject of Hindi in Zila Parishad Jaipur and / or in other Zila Parishads. And in the event the petitioner is allowed to change / rectify her category from Scheduled Tribe Ex-serviceman to Scheduled Tribe alone, no third party rights / interest is likely to be affected.
Mr. YS Jadaun appearing for the respondents cannot deny the law enunciated by this Court in the case of Kavita Choudhary Versus The Registrar (Examination) & Anr. (supra) stating that errors in on-line application form should be permitted to be cured at any stage before creation of third party rights. He also does not deny the assertion of counsel for the petitioner that there are several vacancies on the post of Teacher Grade-III (Level-II) in the subject of Hindi in Zila Parishad, Jaipur and other Zila Parishads where the petitioner if meritorious could be appointed on the basis of preferences given in her application form.
Having taken into consideration the respective submissions as also the judgment of this Court in the case of Kavita Choudhary Versus The Registrar (Examination) & Anr. (supra), I am of the considered view that this petition is deserving of disposal with a direction that the petitioner's category subject to verification, be considered as Scheduled Tribe and not Scheduled Tribe (Ex-serviceman). The category of the petitioner on being so altered, she be considered for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III (Level-II) in the subject of Hindi in terms of her merit cum preferences for Jaipur Zila Parishad and others in terms of her application form. The compliance with aforesaid direction be made within a period of four weeks from the date of the presentation of certified copy of this order.
Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
