High CourtsSingle Bench

Pushpa Singh Shriwas vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 12 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gautam Chourdiya, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 420 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2782 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 522 words

Gautam Chourdiya, J

1.

Heard on admission.

2.

The application is admitted for hearing.

3.

With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally.

4.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has

been arrested on 07.03.2021 in connection with Crime No. 303/2021, at Police Station- Civil Line, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence

punishable under Section 420 of I.P.C.

5.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 06.03.2021, the complainant lodged a written report at police station, Civil Line, alleging therein that the

present applicant fraudulently obtained Rs.10,45,000/- from the complainant for the treatment and purchasing of the land.

6.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the allegation against the applicant is false and fabricated, she is falsely implicated in the case.

Counsel for the applicant further submits that present applicant and her family members are found Corona Positive and that the applicant/accused has

no criminal antecedents, the case is triable by Magistrate and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, therefore, at this stage, she may be

granted bail.

7.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the Non-Applicant/State opposes prayer for grant of bail and submits that the applicant has no criminal

antecedents.

8.

Having considered the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, taking into consideration the nature of allegation and detention period of

the applicant, who is 38 years old, the case is triable by Magistrate and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents, there is no likelihood of

the applicant tampering with the prosecution evidence or absconding as admitted by both the counsels and conclusion of trial may take some time,

without commenting anything on merits of the case, the application is allowed.

9.

It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court, she shall be released on bail on following conditions:-

(a) she shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

her from disclosing such fact to the Court.

(b) she shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and

(c) she shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to her by the said Court till disposal of the trial.

(d) she shall not involve herself in any offence of similar nature in future or else this order granting bail to the applicant shall automatically stand

cancelled without further reference to the Bench.

Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned police station forthwith who shall inform the trial Court in the event of applicant involving

herself in similar offence in future.

In view of the above I.A. No.1, application for urgent hearing and I.A. No.2, application for hearing the case during summer vacation are disposed of.