High CourtsSingle Bench

Pushpinder Kaur vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 20 December 2024 · Citation: (2024) 12 UK CK 0120

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 — Section 41 · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 3531 Of 2024 (M/S)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 353 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

The case of the petitioner is that he had submitted an application to the Sub- Divisional-Magistrate, Ramnagar, District Nainital under Section 41 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act , 1901 (as applicable in the State of Uttarakhand) for demarcation of his property. The revenue officials did not get the demarcation done. The petitioner moved an another application dated 07.11.2024 (annexure no. 2 to the writ petition) to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ramnagar, District Nainital. The said application is still pending. Therefore, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers: -

“(I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 & 4 to forthwith get the petitioner's property (i.e. khata no. 84, khasra no. 328 Min, measuring 0.044 hectare, situated at Village Dhikuli, Tehsil Ramnagar, District Nainital, khata no. 78, khasra no. 329, measuring 0.063 hectare, khata no. 70, khasra no. 324,325 & 32 6) demarcated within such time frame as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.

(II) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2.

Heard Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Devendra Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4.

3.

Mr. Devendra Pant, Advocate, has sought four weeks’ time to decide the application dated 07.11.2024.

4.

With the consent of both the parties, the present writ petition (WPMS No. 3531 of 2024) is disposed of by directing the Assistant Collect or In-charge of Sub Division Ramnagar, District Nainital to decide the application of the petitioner dated 07.11.2024, filed under Section 41 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 (as applicable in the State of Uttarakhand) and to pass order in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible but not later than four week s from the date of production of certified copy of t his or der.