AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 121 wordsWe are unable to accept the view of the District Magistrate as to the interpretation of Section 454, Criminal Procedure Code, which must, we
think, be read along with Section 443. The Second-Class Magistrate was disqualified to try the accused solely because the accused was a
European British subject. When the accused appeared before the Magistrate he relinquished his right to be dealt with as such British subject and
therefore lost all the benefit of the special procedure laid down in chapter XXXIII. This is the view taken of the law by both the Calcutta and
Bombay High Courts, and we think it is the proper construction to be put upon Sections 443 and 454.
We decline to interfere.