High CourtsDivision Bench

Queen-Empress vs Ram Sundar and Another

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 30 July 1896 · Citation: (1897) ILR (All) 109

HON’BLE JUDGES
John Edge, J · Blennerhassett, J
RESULT
Dismissed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 121 words

John Edge, Kt., C.J. and Blennerhassett, J.—The offence of kidnapping for which Earn Sundar and Musammat Anupa have been committed for trial took place in Nepal. The charge was inquired into by a Magistrate in British India and the commitment for an offence u/s 363 of the Indian Penal Code was made, but no certificate of the Political Agent in Nepal, which is required by the provisions of Section 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as a condition precedent to the hearing of the charge in British India, was produced or is shown to have been issued. The proviso to Section 188 is prohibitive, and under the circumstances we hold that the Magistrate had no jurisdiction. We quash the commitment.