AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
P. Sathasivam, J.—The petitioner by name R. Sakthivel, challenges the impugned order of detention dated 28.02.2006, detaining his sister
Ramayee, as "" Bootlegger"" u/s 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders,
Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1981 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982).
Heard both sides.
Even at the foremost the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was delay in considering the representation of the detenue,
which vitiates the ultimate order of detention. With reference to the said claim the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has placed details, which
show that the representation of the detenue dated 12.04.2006 was received by the Government on 20.04.2006 and remarks were called on
21.04.2006, remarks were received on 04.05.2006. After receipt of the remarks, though the file was submitted to the Under Secretary and
Deputy Secretary on 05.05.2006, the same was dealt with by both the authorities only on 22.05.2006. The Minister for Prohibition and Excise
passed orders on 23.05.2006, rejection letter was prepared on the same day, i.e., on 23.05.2006; the rejection letter was sent to the detenue on
25.05.2006 and the rejection letter was served on the detenue only on 29.05.2006. As rightly pointed out though the file was submitted to the
Under Secretary and Deputy Secretary on 05.05.2006, the authorities dealt with the same only on 22.05.20 06; and there is no explanation or
reason for the huge delay in considering the file. In the absence of any explanation, we hold that there is a delay between 05.05.2006 and
22.05.2006. On this ground, the impugned detention order is quashed; accordingly, this petition is allowed. The order of detention impugned in the
petition is set aside and the detenue is directed to be set at liberty forthwith from the custody unless she is required in connection with any other
case.