AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Barin Ghosh, C.J.—These appeals raise similar contentions in the backdrop of similar facts and, accordingly, heard and decided together.
The subject matter of challenge in the writ petitions was an order dated 20.10.2003, whereby the Appellants, who were earlier Class IV employees and promoted as Class III employees, were reverted back to Class IV. The said reversion order was passed in view of an order passed by this Court holding that the promotions given to the Petitioners were in breach of Rule 4 of the Government Servants (Criterion for Recruitment by Promotion) Rules, 1994. Petitioners were not parties to the writ petition, on which the said order was passed by this Court. The writ petitions of the Appellants were not entertained in view of availability of efficacious alternative remedy available to the Appellants, as it was thought that the Appellants can have the remedy sought for in the writ petitions before the Public Services Tribunal. It is doubtful, whether Public Services Tribunal could declare on a claim petition that the views expressed by this Court in a writ petition resulting in the order affecting the Petitioners as inappropriate. Be that as it may, Petitioners, instead of approaching the Public Services Tribunal, filed review applications before this Court with applications for condonation of delay. The said review applications have been rejected upon dismissing the applications for condonation of delay. In present admittedly Public Services Tribunal is not functioning. The Appellants are accordingly remediless. Further it would be efficacious to have the dispute raised in the writ petitions sorted out by this Court, inasmuch as, the order impugned in the writ petitions is a fall out of a decision rendered by this Court in yet another writ petition, to which the Appellants were not parties.
We, accordingly, set aside the order under review as well as the order dated 11.08.2008 declining to entertain the writ petitions. Let the writ petitions be heard on merit.
