High CourtsDivision Bench

Radhey Shyam Yadav vs Assistant Commissioner & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 18 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 UK CK 1157

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ · Subhash Upadhyay, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 389 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 152 words

Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ

1) The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 31.08.2024 by which GST registration of his firm has been cancelled on the ground of fraud, willful misstatement and suppression of facts.

2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would apply for revocation after depositing the entire tax liability and the department be directed to consider the revocation application.

3) Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel appearing for the revenue, submits that in case the entire tax amount is deposited, the application would be considered.

4) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek revocation after depositing the entire amount of tax due against the firm in pursuance of any order passed by the department so far, and in which event, the application would be considered by the department in accordance with law.

5) Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.