AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
The petitioner is offered a Letter of Indent for conducting a petroleum outlet by the 5th respondent and the 5th respondent has submitted Ext.P2
application before the 4th respondent, requesting for NOC.
It is also stated by the petitioner that the 3rd respondent has forwarded Ext.P3 report, according to which IRC 12-2016 norms are not complied with
and therefore NOC cannot be granted.
Petitioner relies on Ext.P4 judgment.
The petitioner has sought for a direction to the 4th respondent to issue a No Objection Certificate without insisting norms in IRC 12- 2016. The
petitioner also pointed out that this Court has in Ext.P4 judgment directed the District Collector in a similar case to consider the application for NOC
without insisting on IRC/MORTH guidelines.
Therefore the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to consider the application Ext.P2 in accordance with law without insisting
IRC/MORTH guidelines within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
