AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 447 wordsIn WPC No.3663/2008, the petitioner has called in question the legality and validity of the order passed by the High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee (henceforth 'the Committee') on 10.12.2007 holding that the petitioner does not belong to Kunbi, OBC community. In WPC No.38/2017, the petitioner would assail the show cause notice issued to him by the Collector, Gariyaband, as to why appropriate action may not be taken against him under the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 for obtaining false caste certificate. The petitioner is presently holding the office of President, Janpad Panchayat Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband.
The petitioner claims to be a member of Kunbi, OBC community and had obtained a caste status certificate which was cancelled on 19.10.2005. The Committee issued show cause notice to the petitioner to file documents in support of his claim that he belongs to Kunbi community. However, the petitioner could not file any document substantiating his claim. On the contrary, investigation report in respect of the petitioner's caste status reveals that Dakhil Kharij Register of Boys Primary School, Rajim where the petitioner got admitted on 1.8.1969 is carrying an entry in respect of the petitioner's caste status showing that he belongs to "Maratha" community. Similarly, in Misal Bandobast of 1930-31 of village Kondkera, Rajim, caste status of his ancestor (Kundu, Wd/o Narayan Rao Mahadik) is also mentioned as "Maratha".
In the absence of any proof submitted by the petitioner showing any authentic document carrying his caste status as Kunbi, OBC, the Committee concluded that the petitioner wrongly and fraudulently obtained caste status certificate of being a member of OBC community.
In the matter of Director of Tribunal Welfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Laveti Giri and Another {AIR 1995 SC 1506}, it is held that onus to prove caste status is on the person who claims to be belonging to such caste. The present petitioner failed to discharge that onus by producing cogent, reliable and clinching evidence. Therefore, finding recorded by the Committee being in the nature of finding of fact, which has been arrived at after following principles of natural justice, the same is not interfere-able while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The show cause notice issued by the Collector, Gariyaband which is under challenge in WPC No.38/2017 is also sans merit for the reason that once caste certificate has been cancelled and the Committee has concluded that the petitioner does not belong to Kunbi, OBC community, necessary legal consequences would follow and the authorities cannot be restrained from proceeding ahead with the matter.
For the above stated reasons, both the Writ Petitions deserve to be and are hereby dismissed.
