AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 239 wordsAnoop Chitkara, J
A lecturer of Sanskrit, who has only five months to retire, has come up before this Court seeking quashing of his transfer order dated 24.7.2020,
whereby he was transferred from Smt. Shail Bala Government Model Senior Secondary School, Baldwara, District Mandi to Government Senior
Secondary School, Barot, District Mandi, H.P.
We have heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Rita Goswami, learned Additional Advocate General for the
respondents.
In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents.
Given the clause 5.5 of the Comprehensive Guiding Principles-2013, of the transfer policy applicable in the State of Himachal Pradesh, which
provides that an employee, who has less than two years to retire, should be posted in the convenient places/ stations, we dispose of this writ petition
with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the first respondent, within one week for suitable adjustment, strictly in accordance with the
transfer policy. On receipt of such representation, the said respondent shall decide the same, in the light of the transfer policy occupying the field, and
pass appropriate orders, within two weeks. Subject to filing of representation by the petitioner within the time-frame mentioned above, the operation of
impugned order dated 24.7.2020 (Annexure P-1), qua the petitioner, shall remain stayed till the disposal of the representation. Pending application(s), if
any, are closed.
