High CourtsSingle Bench

Rahul vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 9 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 KL CK 0089

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 307, 324, 452, 506(ii)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1931 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 411 words

Dr Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This application is filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.1396/2022 of Vithura Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 452, 506(ii), 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 18.12.2022 at about 6.15 p.m., the applicant trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and assaulted him with dangerous weapons with the intention to kill him and thereby committed the offences.

4.

I have heard Sri.S.Nikhil Sankar, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.P.M.Prasanth, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6.

The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 27.12.2022. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation is over and final report has already been filed. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For all these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(ii) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(iii) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(iv) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(v) The application, if any, for deletion/ modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.