High CourtsSingle Bench

Rahul Kannojiya vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 26 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0163

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay S. Agrawal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)(ii)(C)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 1448 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 382 words

Sanjay S. Agrawal, J

1.

This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as the

Cr.P.C.), seeking grant of regular bail to him, as he has been arrested on 27.10.2020 in connection with Crime No. 173 of 2020, registered in Police

Station Nagarnaar, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) (C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Act, 1985 (for brevity, the Act of 1985).

2.

According to the prosecution story, a secret information was received by the concerned Police Station and based upon which, a search was made

whereby the alleged contraband article (ganja) was seized from the possession of the applicant and on this basis, the alleged offence has been

registered.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the said crime.

It is contended further that the charge-sheet has already been filed and there is no antecedent registered against him and he is in jail since 27.10.2020,

and therefore, he may be enlarged on bail, particularly, when the other co-accused has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this

Court vide order dated 13.04.2021 passed in M.Cr.C.No.1435 of 2021.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent has opposed the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary carefully.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and considering further that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail with regard

to the same crime number and since there is no antecedent registered against the applicant and that the trial is likely to take some time for its final

disposal, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on

his executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.50,000/- with one local surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear

before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court.