High CourtsSingle Bench

Rahul Kumar And Ors. vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 December 2024 · Citation: (2024) 12 UK CK 0054

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Purohit, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 323, 498A, 504, 506 · Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 3, 4
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 117 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 266 words

Pankaj Purohit, J

1.

Present C528 application has been filed by the applicants along with the compounding application (IA/1/2024) for quashing the entire proceedings of Crl. Case No.543 of 2021 (FIR No.51 of 2021), State v. Rahul Kumar and two others, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 IPC and under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2.

A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.11.2024 directed the parties to the proceedings to appear before the District Legal Services Authority, District Udham Singh Nagar on 27.11.2024 at 11:30 A.M., who, in turn, was directed to record the statements of parties and verify the contents of the affidavits filed along with the compounding application.

3.

The compliance report of Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, District Udham Singh Nagar dated 27.11.2024 is available on record.

4.

From perusal of the compliance report, it is evidently clear that both the parties have entered into compromise and there is no dispute pending between them as they have settled their disputes amicably. Parties were also duly identified before the said authority.

5.

In this view of the matter, Compounding Application (IA/1/2024) is allowed. As a result, entire proceedings of Crl. Case No.543 of 2021 (FIR No.51 of 2021), State v. Rahul Kumar and two others, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 IPC and under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar, are hereby quashed.

6.

C528 petition stands disposed of accordingly.