High CourtsSingle Bench

Rahul Meena vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 5 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 MP CK 0050

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunita Yadav, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2), 49(Ka)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 13619 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 521 words

@JUDGEMENT- JUDGEMENT

Sunita Yadav, J

This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the CrPC for grant of bail relating to Crime No. 124 of 2024 registered at Police Station Hazira, District Gwalior (M.P.) for the offence under Section 34 (2) and 49 (Ka) of Madhya Pradesh Excise Act.

Allegation against the present applicant is that 43 litres of country made liquor has been seized from vehicle Tumtum bearing No.MP07 R 9457 which was being driven by the present applicant/accused for which he was not having valid license as well as 05 liters of illicit liquor has been seized from the possession of the applicant which was suspected to be unfit for human consumption.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. He is under custody since 18.03.2024. The offence is triable by JMFC and trial is likely to take long time to conclude.

Applicant is the permanent resident of District Gwalior (M.P.), therefore, there is no possibility of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence.

He is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions imposed by this Court while granting bail. On these grounds, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

Per contra, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State vehemently opposed the bail application and prayed for its dismissal.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary available on record.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

1) The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2) The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3 ) The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence for which he is accused;

5) The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6 ) The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;

7) In case the FSL report is found positive, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to this Court.

Learned State counsel is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station for information and necessary action.

E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible, by the office of this Court.

Certified copy as per rules.