High Courts(1896) 12 CAL CK 0010

Rai Ramani Dasi vs Surendra Nath Dutt

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 10 December 1896

RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Appeal From Appellate Order No. 144 of 1896

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 161 words
1.

In this case the judgment-debtor is the appellant. He was sued for rent, and the decree-holder got a decree on the 23rd April, 1894. The tenure was advertised for sale in 1895, and the decree-holder wants to have it sold subject to a mortgage which he has against the judgment-debtor. Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act enacts as follows :--"Where a mortgagee in execution of a decree for the satisfaction of any claim, whether arising under the mortgage or not, attaches the mortgaged property, he shall not be entitled to bring such property to sale otherwise than by instituting a suit u/s sixty-seven, and he may institute such-suit notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 43."

2.

It appears to us that the provisions of this section prohibit the sale of the property, though not its attachment. We therefore set aside the decision of the lower Court, and dismiss the application for sale with costs.