High CourtsSingle Bench

Raisingh And Ors. vs State Of Chhattisgarh @APPELLANT

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 30 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 CHH CK 0374

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section — Section 147, 148, 149, 302, 342 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25, 27 · Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 — Section 10, 13, 16, 18, 20 · Chhattisgarh Vishesh Jan Suraksha Adhiniyam, 2005 — Section 8
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
M.Cr.C. No. 1526 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 272 words
1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have

been arrested in connection with Crime No.03/2017 registered at Police Station Kallari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) for the offence punishable under

Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 342 of the IPC, Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, Sections 10, 13, 16, 18, 20 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and

Section 8 of the Chhattisgarh Vishesh Jan Suraksha Adhiniyam, 2005.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicants along with co-accused committed murder of the deceased and thereby committed the

aforesaid offences.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the applicants have not committed any offence and have been falsely implicated in crime in

question, the applicants are in jail since 28-09-2017 and no useful purpose will be served by detaining them in jail, therefore, they may be released on

regular bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, further taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence and the

manner in which the offence is said to have been committed by the applicants, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of regular bail to the

applicants.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is rejected. However, the Trial Court concerned is directed to expedite the

trial.