High CourtsSingle Bench

Raj Kali And Others vs State Of H.P. & Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 1 November 2025 · Citation: (2025) 11 SHI CK 1835

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satyen Vaidya, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2358, 2359, 2360, 2361, 2362, 2363, 2364 2366 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 205 words

Satyen Vaidya, J

1.

Notice. Learned Additional Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cases of the petitioners are squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 56 of 2020, titled as Nek Ram vs. State of H.P. & others, decided on 26.11.2021. He further submits that petitioners shall be content in case the respondents are directed to consider the cases of the petitioners in a time bound manner in light of judgment ibid.

3.

Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of without making any comments on the merits of the cases of the petitioners. It is directed that respondents shall consider the cases of the petitioners in light of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 56 of 2020, titled as Nek Ram vs. State of H.P. & others, decided on 26.11.2021 within eight weeks from today and will decide the same by passing speaking orders. In case, the petitioners are fo nd similarly situated as petitioners in the above menti ned judgments, they will also be granted the same benefits as granted to petitioners in above referred cases. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stand disposed of.