High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 01 UK CK 0008

Raj Krishna vs District Magistrate/Collector & others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 12 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj K. Tiwari
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
152 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 268 words
1.

Petitioner took a loan of Rs.3.92 lakh (Rupees Three Lakh & Ninety Two Thousand Only) from Almora Kshetriya Gramin Bank (now

Uttarakhand Gramin Bank) in the year 2007. According to the petitioner, he has paid the entire loan in the year 2009, however, Bank is not issuing

No Dues Certificate"" to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the Khata Khautani of the petitioner, in respect of his

agricultural land, the charge on petitioner''s property is being disclosed, which is causing hardship to him, as he is unable to take loan and other

facilities against it.

2.

On the other hand, Mr. K.K. Shah, learned counsel for the Bank submits that petitioner is yet to liquidate the loan and there are certain dues

which are still outstanding against him.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer and submits that petitioner may be permitted to approach the Competent

Authority/Branch Manager of the concerned Bank and the Competent Authority may be directed to examine the matter and take appropriate

decision.

4.

Mr. K.K. Shah, learned counsel for the Bank submits that if petitioner makes a fresh representation to the Branch Manager/Authorised Officer

of the Bank, the Bank shall look into the matter and take a decision in the matter sympathetically.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make a fresh representation to the Branch Manager of the Bank within

ten days from today. If such representation is made, Branch Manager/Authorized Officer shall look into the matter and take appropriate decision,

in accordance with law, within four weeks thereafter.