High CourtsSingle Bench

Raj Kumar Gupta vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 17 November 2010 · Citation: (2010) 11 P&H CK 0101

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jaswant Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B, 201, 419, 420, 467 · Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 13(1)(2)
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 58823 of 2010 in Criminal Appeal No. S-2713-SB of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 500 words

Jaswant Singh, J.—Prayer is for suspension of sentence on behalf of the applicant-Appellant Raj Kumar Gupta who has been convicted and

sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs. 1500/-and in default of payment of fine he is further directed

to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months for offence punishable under Sections 120B r/w 420, 201, 467, 468, 471, 419,

477A Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, further directed to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs.1500/- and in default of payment of fine he is further directed to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of two months for offence punishable u/s 420 of Indian Penal Code, further directed to to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of three years with fine of Rs.2500/- and in default of payment of fine he is further directed to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of three months for offence punishable u/s 467 of Indian Penal Code, further directed to to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs.1500/- and in default of payment of fine he is further directed to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of two months for offence punishable u/s 468 of Indian Penal Code, further directed to to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs.1500/- and in default of payment of fine he is further directed to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of two months for offence punishable u/s 471 of Indian Penal Code, further directed to to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of two years, further directed to to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year with fine of Rs.1500/- and in

default of payment of fine he is further directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months for offence punishable u/s 201 of

Indian Penal Code and further directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs.1500/- and in default of

payment of fine he is further directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months for offence punishable u/s 13(2) read with

13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2.

The appeal has already been admitted vide order dated 16.11.2010. Learned Counsel for the applicant-Appellant Raj Kumar Gupta submits

that the sentence of the applicant-Appellant Raj Kumar Gupta has already been suspended by the trial court upto 20.11.2010 and directed to

surrender on 22.11.2010 as 21.11.2010 is Sunday in order to enable him to file appeal.

3.

Keeping in view the fact that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future, the sentence of the applicant-Appellant Raj Kumar Gupta

already suspended is extended during the pendency of the present appeal. It is ordered that applicant-Appellant Raj Kumar Gupta be admitted to

bail subject to the satisfaction of the CJM/Duty Magistrate, Chandigarh.