High CourtsSingle Bench

Raj Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 December 2025 · Citation: (2025) 12 P&H CK 1870

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jagmohan Bansal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226, 227
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 7155 Of 2001 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 156 words

Jagmohan Bansal, J

1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of orders dated 10.07.1989, 05.07.1990, 07.07.1994 & 03.11.2000 and further seeking direction to respondent to promote him as Head Constable (HC) from the date his juniors were promoted.

2.

The petitioner was enlisted as Constable Messenger on 26.10.1973. He was recruited in Telecommunication Wing of Haryana Police. By impugned orders, his claim for promotion as HC was denied.

3.

The petitioner joined service in 1973, thus, in all probabilities, he has retired on attaining the age of superannuation.

4.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that with the efflux of time, petitioner has lost his interest to pursue the matter.

5.

DISMISSED with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application within six months from today, if cause survives.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.