High Courts(1891) 02 MAD CK 0009

Rajah M. Bhaskara Setupati vs Valasubramaniya Pillai

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 February 1891 · Citation: (1896) 6 MLJ 250

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 98 words
1.

We see nothing in the language of Section 11 of Reg. XXV of 1802 to exclude the jurisdiction of other Courts than the Court of Adawlut in

suits by Karnams improperly removed from office, as is done in express words in the case of suits by a Zamindar to remove a Karnam from office.

And there are numerous reported cases, in which such suits by Karnams have been [240] instituted in District Munsiffs'' Courts without objection.

We think the Subordinate Judge was right in overruling the objection to jurisdiction.

2.

The second appeal is dismissed with costs.