High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajan Ram vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 August 2011 · Citation: (2011) 08 UK CK 0175

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 — Section 3, 7 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 218, 406, 409, 420, 467
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 688 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 182 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Heard.

2.

Applicant- Rajan Ram, who is in jail in 2 connection with Crime No. 142 of 2010 relating to offences punishable u/s 409, 420, 406, 218, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., and one punishable u/s 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, 1955, police station Kapkot, District Bageshwar, has sought his release on bail.

3.

Applicant is Store Incharge in the office of District Supply Officer Bageshwar. The allegation is that on the inspection by local Member of Legislative Assembly mis management was found in distribution of Mid day meal ration of the school children. Co accused Mahendra Singh Burathokey has already been granted bail by this Court.

4.

Having considered submissions of learned Counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view, that applicant deserves bail.

5.

The Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant-Rajan Ram be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bageshwar.