High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajappa vs State Of Tamilnadu

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 February 2026 · Citation: (2026) 02 MAD CK 1747

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.Srimathy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023- 123, 269 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 328 · Cigarettes And Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition Ofadvertisement And Regulation Of Trade And Commerce, Production, Supply And Distribution) Act, 2003 — Section 24(1)
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 3074 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 464 words

S.Srimathy, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.01.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 123 of BNS, 2023, (corresponding offence u/s. 328 of IPC) and Section 24(1) of the COTPA Act, in Crime No.8 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 7.875 kgs of banned tobacco products namely, 'Ganesh'. Hence, the complaint.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 30.01.2026. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has 16 previous cases.

Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5.

Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District, and on further conditions that :-

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall pay the cost of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of Women Advocates Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (Account No:6477041768, IFSC Code:-IDIB00H040, Indian Bank, High Court Branch, Madurai) for the purpose of maintaining Creche; on such deposit being made the learned Magistrate shall accept the sureties;

[c] the petitioner shall report before the trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation by the respondent police;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 9 BNS.