High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajaram vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 13 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 CHH CK 0031

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajani Dubey, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376(2)(n), 376(3), 417, 450 · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 6
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6726 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 376 words
1.

The matte is heard through video conferencing.

2.

The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for releasing him on regular bail during

trial in connection with Crime No. 43/2021 registered at Police Station- Trikunda, District-Balrampur Ramnujganj (C.G.) for the offence punishable

under Sections 450, 376(2)(n), 417, 376(3) of IPC & Section 6 of POCSO Act.

3.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that applicant committed sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix on the pretext of marriage. Thereafter, offence

has been registered against the applicant and he has been taken into custody.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits

that prosecutrix did not support the case of the prosecution and turned hostile. He next added that applicant has no criminal antecedent and he is in jail

since 03.07.2021, charge-sheet has been filed there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future, therefore, the present applicant may be

released on bail.

5.

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application and the submission made in this respect. It is submitted that the offence

committed by the applicant is of serious in nature, and, therefore, no case is made out for grant of bail.

6.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7.

Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, and further considering the fact that

prosecutrix did not support the case of the prosecution and turned hostile and applicant is in jail since 03.07.2021 and charge-sheet has been filed, the

trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the

application is allowed.

8.

Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/-, with one local surety in the like sum

to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court.