High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajat Kumar (Karanwal) vs Union Of India & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 December 2021 · Citation: (2021) 12 UK CK 0237

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 323, 498A · Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 3, 4
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2773 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 338 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner's passport was impounded by the Regional Passport Officer, Dehradun, vide order dated 29.07.2021 on the ground that an F.I.R. was lodged against him under Section 498-A, 323 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, by Shrishti Karanwal and further that a criminal prosecution was also pending against the petitioner in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun for the aforesaid offences.

2.

According to the petitioner, since the criminal proceedings have been quashed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Application (C-482) No. 1818 of 2021, therefore, the passport be released.

3.

Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has pointed out that against the order of impounding, petitioner has filed an appeal, which is pending before Chief Passport Officer (respondent no. 4).

4.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-

"1-issue to issue appropriate writ, direction or order to quash and set-aside the impugned order dated 29-07-2021 passed by the respondent no. 3 and 4.

2-Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities particularly respondent No. 2, 3 and 4 to release the passport No. T2496335 of the petitioner so that the petitioner can go back to his place of posting, and also to update the system that the passport of the petitioner has been released so that petitioner has no problem at any Air Port while travelling abroad."

5.

Since petitioner's appeal is pending before Competent Authority, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to submit the judgment rendered by this Court in Criminal Misc. Application (C-482) No. 1818 of 2021 before the Appellate Authority. If petitioner produces the judgment rendered in Criminal Misc. Application (C-482) No. 1818 of 2021 within one week from today, the Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal, as early as possible, preferably within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

6.

Let a certified copy of this order be issued within 24 hours.