High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajbir Singh @ Raja vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 April 2011 · Citation: (2011) 04 P&H CK 0128

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25, 27 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 148, 149, 307
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. M-37198 of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 270 words

Alok Singh, J.—This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 3 dated 30.4.2010 under Sections 307/148/149 IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act, Police Station Khilchian, District Amritsar Rural.

2.

This Court vide order dated 22.12.2010 has directed to release the Petitioner on interim bail.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that Petitioner has already been released on bail and the Petitioner has joined the investigation and shall join the investigation as and when he is asked to do so by the Investigating Officer.

4.

Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions of ASI Gurnam Singh, who is present personally in Court, states that Petitioner has not fired any shot and has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required in view of the fact that weapon has already been deposited in the police station.

5.

Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 22.12.2010 is made absolute, subject to the following conditions:

(i) that he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that he shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

6.

It is made clear that in the event of violation of any of the conditions, prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of the bail.