High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Rajdeep Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 23 October 2017 · Citation: (2017) 10 P&H CK 0026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anupinder Singh Grewal
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=3863>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973</a>, <a href=3863-438>Section 438(2)</a> - Direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest · <a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-324>Section 324</a>, <a href=1767-307>Sect
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
M-22308 of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

32 paragraphs · 288 words
1.

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR

No.203 dated 18.11.2015 under Sections 307 / 452 / 323 / 324 / 427 /

506 / 148 / 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Daba, District

Ludhiana City.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that FIR

was lodged on the statement of one Sukhwinder Pal Singh to the

effect that Monu Anda r/o Guru Nanank Nagar along with 10-15

persons came on their motorcycle with Kirpan and other

weapons and entered into the complainant''s house and inflicted

injuries to his mother and uncle Rajpal and fled away.

3.

Learned counsel further contends that petitioner was

not named in the FIR and no injury was attributed to him. In the

supplementary statement dated 25.10.2016 made by

complainant, Kaka s/o Geja is alleged to have given brick bats on

him along with Gabbar s/o Sher Singh. He further contends that

even in the supplementary statement, name of petitioner has not

been mentioned.

4.

This Court, by the order dated 07.09.2017 had

directed the petitioner to join investigation and in the event of his

arrest, he was ordered to be released on ad-interim bail to the

satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the

conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

5.

Learned State counsel, upon instructions from SI

Baljinder Singh, states that in pursuance to the order dated

07.09.2017, the petitioner has joined investigation and is not

required for custodial interrogation.

6.

In view of the above and without expressing any

opinion on the merits of case, the order dated 07.09.2017,

granting ad-interim bail to the petitioner, is hereby made

absolute. However, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions

envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

7.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.