High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajeesh Radhakrishnan vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 16 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 KL CK 0184

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 420, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 644 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 527 words

Dr Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This is an application filed u/s 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2.

The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No.135/2022 of Vaikom Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 498A, 420 read with 34 of the IPC.

3.

The prosecution case in short is that the defacto complainant was subjected to cruelty, both physically and mentally by the petitioner and the remaining accused demanding more dowry and further, the petitioner misrepresented the defacto complainant that he is working in Australia, thus, induced her to marry him and thereby committed the offences.

4.

Heard both sides and perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that there are no materials to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime and hence he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. He contended that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the petitioner and if the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, it would affect the course of investigation.

6.

The crime was registered pursuant to a private complaint filed by the defacto complainant. The complaint was forwarded by the learned Magistrate to the police for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. It was thereafter, the crime was registered. The accused Nos. 2 and 3 are the in-laws of the defacto complainant. They were already granted anticipatory bail. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner does not appear to be necessary. For all these reasons, the petitioner is entitled to pre-arrest bail on conditions.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for the purpose of discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every Saturday until further orders. The petitioner shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required by him.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of like nature while on bail.

(v) The petitioner shall not make any attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The petitioner shall not leave State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion, modification of bail conditions or for cancellation of bail on the ground of violation of the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.