High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajeev vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 23 February 2011 · Citation: (2011) 02 UK CK 0093

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 323, 326, 452, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 137 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 142 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Applicant- Rajeev, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 407 of 2010, relating to offences punishable u/s 323, 326, 506, 452 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that no -2 specific role has been assigned to the applicant in commission of the crime .

4.

Having considered submissions of learned Counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail.

5.

The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Rajeev be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar