High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 12 UK CK 0336

Rajendra Mimani vs Power Transmission Corporation Of Uttarakhand Ltd

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 31 December 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Mishra, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Petition No. 34 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 251 words

S.K. Mishra, J

1.

In this application, filed under sub-section (6) of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the ‘Act’), the applicant

has prayed for appointment of one or more independent and impartial persons as Arbitrator(s) to constitute a sole Arbitrator.

2.

Clause 54.2 of the Agreement dated 05.08.2016 is the arbitration clause for resolving the disputes between the parties, which is not disputed by the

learned counsel for the respondent.

3.

Both the learned counsel submit that the sole Arbitrator may be appointed. Both the learned counsel has made a suggestion before this Court that

former Judge of this Court Mr. Justice V.K. Bist, R/o D-37, MDDA Colony, Sahastradhara Enclave, Sahastradhara Road, Dehradun, be appointed as

the sole Arbitrator.

5.

Hence, this application is disposed of accordingly by appointing Mr. Justice V.K. Bist, R/o D-37, MDDA Colony, Sahastradhara Enclave,

Sahastradhara Road, Dehradun, as the sole Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties.

6.

Let the Arbitrator be intimated accordingly. The learned Arbitrator shall, in terms of Section 11(8) of the 1996 Act, furnish his disclosure in writing

to this Court within 15 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. He shall, thereafter, fix his remuneration, and charges towards

other expenses, in consultation with the parties to the dispute. He shall endeavour to complete the arbitral proceedings, and to pass an award with

utmost expedition, preferably within six months from the date on which he enters upon a reference.