High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajendra Parshad Sirvi vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 29 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 RAJ CK 0126

HON’BLE JUDGES
Farjand Ali, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 21, 32A, 37 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 389
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension Of Sentence Application No.1073 Of 2023 In Criminal Revision Petition No. 1751 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 461 words

Farjand Ali, J

1.

The instant application for suspension of sentence has been moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated 25.08.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, No.1, Sriganganagar in Special Sessions Case No.43/2016 whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum punishment of five years rigorous imprisonment along with compensation fine of Rs.10,000/-under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act.

2.

It is contended that the learned trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be appreciated again by this Court being the first appellate Court. Hearing of the appeal is likely to take long time, therefore, the application for suspension of sentence may be granted.

3.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the accused-applicant for releasing the appellant on application for suspension of sentence.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

5.

Considering the overall submissions of the parties and the allegedly recovered contraband is well below the commercial quantity, thus, the embargo contained under Section 37 and 32A of the NDPS Act is not attracted in the present case. Looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case while refraining from passing any comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on hearing of the appeal, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant.

6.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, No.1, Sriganganagar in Special Sessions Case No.43/2016 against the appellant-applicant Rajendra Parshad Sirvi S/o Mahaveer Parshad Sirvi shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on 29.09.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1.

That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2.

That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3.

Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.