High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajendra Prasad Badoni vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 15 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 UK CK 1152

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Purohit, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 152
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 1378 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 234 words

Pankaj Purohit, J

1.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to 3 to demolish the illegal construction made by the respondent no.4 to 6 on the land bearing Khasra No.2660 Area measuring 0.0900 mutated and recorded in the name of Gram Sabha in revenue records.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to 3 to take necessary action against the respondent no.4 to 6 for encroachment and for doing illegally constructions of the land of the Gram Sabha in accordance with law."

2.

From perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, it transpires that there is a dispute between the petitioner and respondent no.6 regarding some public path, and therefore, this writ petition has been filed alleging that he is encroaching upon the land of the Gram Sabha. If it is so, the Gram Sabha can very well maintain a suit for ejectment of respondent no. 7 from its property, and further, if a public nuisance is caused by the petitioner, he can also maintain proceedings under Section 152 of the BNS, 2023 before the court of competent jurisdiction.

3.

In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed in-limine.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.