High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajendra Singh vs R.K. Kunwar & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 16 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0236

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 252 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 103 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner had approached this Court for payment of his retiral dues. Writ Court vide order dated 21.03.2017 had allowed the writ petition and

directed the respondents to release/pay the rerital/pensionary benefits along with leave encashment, suspension allowance etc. Within eight weeks.

2.

Ms. Reema Rana, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties makes a statement that pursuant to the order passed by Writ Court, all the

retiral benefits and other monetary benefits have been paid to the petitioner.

3.

In such view of the matter, contempt petition is closed. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged.