High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajendra Singh Bisht vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 15 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 UK CK 0065

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 5(l)(n), 6, 376(2)(f)(n), 376(3), 504, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 323 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 177 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant-Rajendra Singh Bisht is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.601 of 2021, under Sections 376 (2) (f) (n), 376 (3), 504, 506 and Section 5 (l)(n)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the victim has major and other witnesses have not supported the prosecution case, even the medical evidence does not support the prosecution case.

4.

Learned State Counsel admits that the victim and her mother, the informant have not supported the prosecution case.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail. Accordingly, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.