High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajendra Singh @ Raju vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 14 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 RAJ CK 0069

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354, 363, 366-A, 376AB · Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4, 7, 8
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15271 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 332 words

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 242/2020 registered

at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu for the offence under Section(s) 363, 366-A, 376AB of IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and later on

for the offence under Section 354 of IPC and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case wherein FIR has been lodged with inordinate

delay of five days. He submitted that even the investigating agency did not find the allegation of commission of rape by him to be true and has after

thorough investigation, filed charge sheet under Section 354 IPC and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act. The maximum punishment awardable in case of his

conviction is five years. He submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 25.09.2020, charge sheet has been filed, trial of the case will take time, he

has no criminal antecedents and prayed for his release on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner,

the nature of allegation against him, his length of custody, filing of charge sheet and absence of criminal antecedents; but, without expressing any

opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Rajendra Singh @ Raju Son Of Hanuman Singh shall be released

on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to

the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.