High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajesh vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 P&H CK 0002

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Puri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 15, 18, 27A · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 174A, 323, 325
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 21027 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 357 words

Vivek Puri, J

The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing due to COVID-19 pandemic.

Through instant petition, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 380 dated 25.12.2020 under Sections 15/27-A of the NDPS Act,

registered at Police Station Agroha, District Hisar.

Precisely, the aforesaid FIR has been registered in pursuance of recovery of 10 kg of poppy husk from Suresh @ Kala (Co-accused).

It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that no recovery has been effected from him, he has been nominated on the basis of disclosure

statement of Suresh @ Kala (Co-accused), his arrest has been effected on 31.03.2021, the investigation of the case is complete and challan has

already been presented in the Court. Furthermore, at present, no other criminal case is pending against him.

Custody certificate has been placed on record.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Gurpreet Singh, has not disputed the aforesaid factual aspect of the matter. Even 1 of 2 custody

certificate indicates that the petitioner has been convicted under Section 174-A IPC in the case bearing FIR No. 166 of 2014, Police Station City

Fatehabad and has undergone the sentence. Furthermore, in other cases i.e. FIR No. 557 of 2012 under Sections 323/325/34 IPC, Police Station

Sadar Hisar and FIR No. 79 of 2013 under Section 18 of the NDPS Act, Police Station City Fatehabad, he has been acquitted.

Keeping in view the fact that no recovery has been effected from the petitioner, he has been nominated on the basis of disclosure statement of co-

accused-Suresh @ Kala, investigation of the case is complete, the challan has already been presented in the Court and conclusion of trial is likely to

take some time on account of restricted hearing of the Courts due to Covid-19 Pandemic, sufficient grounds are made out to extend the concession of

bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, without making any comment on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail,

subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/Trial Court.