AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 266 wordsThe present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R.
No.111/2020, Police Station Sidhmukh District Churu for the offences under Sections 395, 120-B of IPC and section 3/25 of Arms Act.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after rejection of the first bail application by this court vide order dated 04.11.2020, the charge
sheet has been filed. As per the investigating agency, the petitioner was not found present on the spot of the incident, he has been charged under
section 120-B of IPC. The petitioner has also not been identified by the complainant. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore,
it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper
to release the petitioner on bail.
Consequently, the second bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rajesh S/o Ratan Lalarrested in connection with F.I.R.
No.111/2020, Police Station Sidhmukh District Churu shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty
Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees : Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the
stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
