Supreme CourtDivision Bench

Rajesh Ponnada vs Satyanarayana Srirangam & Anr

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 29 January 2019 · Citation: (2019) 1 Cricc 633

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Banumathi, J · R. Subhash Reddy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 353(6), 363(1)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No(S). 2600, 2601 Of 2016, 8954 Of 2018 (II)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 123 words

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Section 353(6) Cr.P.C. stipulates that on the date of judgment, the accused has to be present unless on earlier occasions his personal appearance has been dispensed with. Section 363(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that on being convicted, the accused is entitled to a copy of the judgment free of cost.

Section 363(1) of Cr.P.C. entitling the accused for free copy of the judgment has to be read harmoniously with Section 353(6). The present petitioner having not appeared before the Court on the date of judgment cannot as of right seek for supply of the copy of the judgment.

The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.