High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajesh Sharma vs S.A. Murugation & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 2 December 2021 · Citation: (2021) 12 UK CK 0011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 546 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 164 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

The Division Bench of this Court had directed District Magistrate, Dehradun to initiate eviction proceedings against the persons, who have encroached upon Government Land, Forest Land, Public Road and Cremation Ground, within a period of three months.

2.

Alleging willful disobedience of the said order, this contempt petition was filed.

3.

A response affidavit has been filed by Mr. C. Ravishankar, District Magistrate, Dehradun. In paragraph no. 10 of the said affidavit, it has been stated that, in the land of village Central Hopetown, there is no encroachment on forest land, public road and cremation ground and wherever encroachments in land under category 6(1) were found, action has been initiated for eviction.

2.

In view of the stand taken by the then District Magistrate in his response affidavit, the Contempt Petition is closed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to file contempt petition afresh, if cause of action still survives.