AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
25 paragraphs · 242 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection
with F.I.R. No.484/2016, Police Station Hiran Magri, District
Udaipur for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 120-B of IPC
Counsel for the petitioner contends that the Petitioner is in
judicial custody for magistrate triable offences. Co-accused
Roshan Lal has been released on bail by this Court thus, he prays
that on this ground the petitioner deserves to be granted bail.
Learned P.P. vehemently opposes the submissions advanced
by the petitioner''s counsel.
Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as
available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments
advanced at the Bar but without expressing any opinion on the
merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail
application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered
that the accused-petitioner, Rajesh arrested in connection with
F.I.R. No.484/2016, Police Station Hiran Magri, District Udaipur
shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of
Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear
before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called
upon to do so.
