High CourtsDivision Bench

Rajinder Kumar vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 3 November 2011 · Citation: (2011) 11 SHI CK 0009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Sharma, J · Kurian Joseph, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.P. No. 9334 of 2011-D
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 219 words

Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The petitioners are para teachers. They are aggrieved since they are not paid the vacation salary and other benefits as are paid to the contract teachers. In the judgment dated 21.10.2010 in CWP No. 2880 of 2010, titled as Dhananjay Saini Vs. State of H.P. and others and connected cases, this Court has held that para teachers are entitled to all the emoluments as are paid to contract teachers, because as per the Government policy, they are to be treated similarly for all purposes. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents to pay the eligible vacation salary, during the entire service period to the petitioners in case the same has not been granted so far in view of the judgment of this Court in Baldev Singh Vs. State of H.P. & others, which has become final, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition and copy of the judgment, referred to above. If the amounts are not disbursed as above, the petitioners will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same.

2.

The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.