High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajinder Kumari And Another vs State Of Punjab And Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 July 2019 · Citation: (2019) 07 P&H CK 0025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 438(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 420
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 18415 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 418 words

Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J

Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr. P.C.') for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioners, in FIR No.0050 dated 07.04.2019, under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station City Nawanshahar (SBS

Nagar), District SBS Nagar.

Mr. K.S. Mehta, Advocate appears, files vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2 and the same is taken on record.

Allegations against the petitioners are that they cheated the complainant by not executing the sale-deed.

On 29.04.2019, this Court has passed the following order:-

“Contends that petitioners are ready to return an amount of Rs. 5 lacs to the complainant within four weeks' from today and out of that, Rs.3 lacs

shall be paid within one week.

Adjourned to 08.07.2019, for further consideration.

In the meanwhile, petitioners are directed to join the investigation before the Investigating Officer. In the event of their arrest, the Arresting Officer

would admit them to interim bail till the next date of hearing on their furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to his satisfaction. The petitioners are

also directed to abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.â€​

Contends that in terms of above order dated 29.04.2019, bankers cheque bearing No.723024 dated 07.05.2019 in the sum of `3 lakhs and cheque

bearing No.723030 dated 23.05.2019 in the sum of `2 lakhs in favour of respondent No.2-complainant have already been handed-over to the

investigating officer on 10.06.2019 but the same were not accepted by the complainant.

Today, the above demand drafts were offered to learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant, but he has also refused to accept the same.

Consequently, let the demand drafts be returned to the petitioners forthwith.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from police official present in Court to assist him has submitted that the petitioners have joined investigation in

terms of order dated 29.04.2019 and their custodial interrogation is not required.

In view of the above, order dated 29.04.2019 granting interim bail to the petitioners, is made absolute subject to the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.

P.C.

Petition stands disposed off, accordingly.

However, it is made clear that the petitioners shall fully co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when called for further investigation.

The above observations may not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. It is also clarified that offer of `5 lakhs will not

prejudice the case of the petitioners pending before the trial Court.