High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajjak and Another vs Rashid and Other

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 May 2014 · Citation: (2014) 05 P&H CK 0481

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Kannan, J
RESULT
Partly Allowed
CASE NUMBER
FAO No. 37 of 2003
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 169 words

K. Kannan, J.—The appeal is for enhancement of compensation for death of a male aged 16 years in an accident that took place on 04.02.2001. The claimants were parents. The contention was that the boy used to assist the parents in vending the milk and earning about Rs. 2500/- per month. The Tribunal assessed a compensation of Rs. 1,30,000/-.

2.

For a boy aged 16 years the assessment made at Rs. 1800/- per month, I would take to be a notional income and I will see no scope for making a further prospect of increase for notional income. I will rework the compensation and tabulate the same as under:-

3.

There shall be an award of Rs. 2,56,400/-. The additional amount of compensation over what has already been provided by the Tribunal shall also attract interest @7.5% from the date of petition till the date of payment. The liability shall be on the insurance company.

4.

The award stands modified and the appeal is allowed to the above extent.