High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajkishore Kunwar & others vs State of Uttarakhand & another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 2 January 2018 · Citation: (2018) 01 UK CK 0013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-120B>Section 120B</a>, <a href=1767-420>Section 420</a>, <a href=1767-468>Section 468</a>, <a href=1767-471>Section 471</a>, <a href=1767-467>Section 467</a>, <a href=1767-506>Section 506</a> - Pu
CASE NUMBER
1756 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 190 words
1.

The First Information Report has been lodged by respondent No.2, which has been registered as Case Crime No. 205 of 2017 under Sections

420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120B of IPC, at Police Station Prem Nagar, District Dehradun. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have

approached this Court for relief.

2.

The first information report was lodged by respondent No.2 against the petitioners alleging that the land was sold to her in the year 2010 by the

petitioners and the same land was already sold to one Omprakash Gupta by the petitioners in the year 2007.

3.

Interim protection was granted to the petitioners by this Court on 28.10.2017, and their arrest was stayed.

4.

Perused the averments made in the writ petition.

5.

There is no averment in the writ petition wherein the petitioners have denied the allegation made in the first information report that they have not

sold the same piece of land earlier in the year 2007 to one Omprakash Gupta.

6.

Consequently, no interference is liable to be made by this Court.

7.

The writ petition stands dismissed. Interim order dated 28.10.2017 also stands vacated.