High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajkumari Maravi vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 5 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 CHH CK 0023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 323, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 533 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 289 words
1.

Heard.

2.

This is an application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants, who are

apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.136/2021 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Korba (CG) for the offence punishable

under Sections 498-A, 294, 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

3.

Applicant No.1 Smt. Rajkumar Maravi is the mother-in-law, whereas, applicant No.2 Smt. Devki Singh is the sister-in-law (Nanand) of complainant

Kalpana Maravi, who was married to the son of applicant No.1 Smt. Rajkumari Maravi on 12.5.2018. It is alleged that the applicants have demanded

Rs. 5 lakhs from the complainant and committed physical cruelty when she failed to satisfy the demand.

4.

Considering that the applicants are ladies and going by their nature of allegations, their custodial interrogation may not be required, I am inclined to

extend the benefit of Section 438 of Cr.P.C. to the applicants.

5.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of these applicants, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on

each of them furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety each in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer with

the following conditions :-

(i) they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required;

(ii) they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

him for disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer.

(iii) they shall not influence the witnesses during pendency of the trial.

Certified copy as per rules.